Banner - NPPA Connect

All Videos

4 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how prior and current treatments for patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) have evolved from traditional systemic therapies with significant limitations to newer targeted biologics and small molecules that specifically address the underlying IL-36 pathway dysregulation, offering improved efficacy and safety profiles for this rare but severe condition.

4 experts are featured in this series.

Panelists discuss how recognizing the flares and triggers of generalized pustular psoriasis requires vigilant monitoring for warning signs such as fever, malaise, and spreading erythema, while understanding that common precipitating factors include medication withdrawals, infections, pregnancy, and certain drugs that can rapidly transform stable disease into acute, potentially life-threatening episodes requiring immediate intervention.

2 experts in this video

Panelists discuss how IL-17 inhibitors are generally well-tolerated, but common adverse effects include infections, particularly candidiasis, and potential increased suicidal ideation risk. Patients should be informed of candidiasis risk, especially with bimekizumab (Gordon, 2022), and monitored for mood changes, as IL-17s and IL-23s may impact mental health (Blauvelt, 2023). Open discussions help assess risks while ensuring treatment benefits.

2 experts in this video

Panelists discuss how IL-17 inhibitors are considered for plaque psoriasis based on disease severity, comorbidities, and patient preference. Selection factors include efficacy, safety, access, and cost. Clinical trial data guide choices, but real-world factors impact use. Dosing varies: secukinumab (300 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then monthly), ixekizumab (160 mg at week 0, then 80 mg biweekly for 12 weeks, then monthly), brodalumab (210 mg weekly for 3 weeks, then biweekly), and bimekizumab (320 mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks, then every 8 weeks). Dosing and device options influence prescribing decisions.

An expert discusses when gene expression profile (GEP) testing is recommended for melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients, including cases where it may not be necessary, and provides final thoughts on the utility of GEP testing in risk stratification and making treatment decisions.

An expert discusses their impressions of the case, classifying the patient’s risk based on the clinical presentation of the lesion, and outlines treatment recommendations without knowing the 40-gene expression profile (GEP) information, including whether adjuvant therapy (ART) would be recommended. The expert also shares how to discuss 40-GEP testing with patients and reassure them that accurate risk levels are crucial for receiving optimal treatment.

1 expert in this video

Aaron Farberg, MD, discusses how, when prescribing therapies for pediatric patients, dermatologists prioritize long-term safety alongside efficacy. Topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared with their oral counterparts, with minimal systemic absorption. Appropriate monitoring may include baseline blood work and periodic clinical assessments, particularly in younger children. Effective parent education balances transparent discussion of potential adverse effects with evidence-based reassurance about the therapy’s safety profile.