Opinion|Videos|September 1, 2025

Exploring the Evolution of Topical Treatments in Seborrheic Dermatitis

A panelist highlights the evolution of seborrheic dermatitis treatment from traditional antifungals and corticosteroids to newer nonsteroidal options such as phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, emphasizing the importance of aligning therapy with patient preferences, lifestyle factors, and long-term disease management needs to improve adherence and outcomes.

Historically, seborrheic dermatitis has been managed with either antifungal treatments targeting Malassezia or anti-inflammatory therapies such as topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. While these options can be effective, they are often limited by vehicle-related issues and safety concerns associated with long-term steroid use. Recent therapeutic advances have introduced targeted, nonsteroidal agents such as PDE4 inhibitors, which offer an alternative for patients requiring ongoing treatment. These newer therapies, especially in patient-preferred vehicles such as foams, address both the inflammatory component of the disease and the practical challenges of application in areas such as the scalp or face.

Topical corticosteroids, though commonly used, pose risks such as skin thinning, pigment changes, and systemic absorption when used chronically. Similarly, antifungal treatments may only partially address disease mechanisms, as the role of yeast is likely secondary to an underlying inflammatory imbalance. For many patients with moderate to severe disease, current therapies often fall short of achieving full clearance or sustained symptom control. Additionally, traditional treatment vehicles—especially ointments, creams, or older foams—can be cosmetically unappealing, greasy, or difficult to apply, particularly on hair-bearing areas or sensitive facial skin.

Effective management of seborrheic dermatitis now increasingly involves aligning therapeutic efficacy with patient lifestyle and preferences. Considering how often a patient washes their hair, their sensitivity to residue, and their tolerance of different textures is essential. Modern foam-based formulations can penetrate hair and provide broad coverage without greasy residue, improving both adherence and satisfaction. Similarly, lightweight, nongreasy options for facial use are important for minimizing discomfort and social impact. Overall, choosing the right treatment goes beyond addressing inflammation: It includes understanding patient needs, long-term goals, and quality-of-life factors that influence outcomes.

Newsletter

Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.


Latest CME