Topical 5-fluorouracil still may be the best bet in actinic keratoses

October 17, 2018

Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is FDA approved for treating actinic keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinoma, shows the strongest evidence of effectiveness for these two conditions plus squamous cell carcinoma, according to a comprehensive systematic review.

Topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is FDA approved for treating actinic keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinoma, shows the strongest evidence of effectiveness for these two conditions plus squamous cell carcinoma, according to a comprehensive systematic review.

Topical 5-FU has also been tested in a variety of other dermatologic conditions,” says principal investigator Michael Cameron, M.D., of the Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora.

The literature search for the review, which was published in the International Journal of Dermatology in October 2018, was conducted at the University of Colorado in 2017.

“As a tertiary academic center, we encounter many difficult cases that sometimes require us to be creative with our therapies,” Dr. Cameron said in an interview with Dermatology Times. “We were curious to see what the evidence was for off-label uses of topical 5-FU in dermatology.”

The investigators were not surprised to find that the strongest evidence of topical 5-FU in dermatology was in its FDA-approved conditions: actinic keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinomas.

“However, we were hoping to see stronger evidence for the use of 5-FU in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma in-situ,” Dr. Cameron says. “Anecdotally, it appears many clinicians use this treatment as a nonsurgical option for patients and many report a fair amount of success. But there is surprisingly very minimal evidence for the use of topical 5-FU in these lesions.”

The literature evidence for squamous cell carcinoma in-situ is limited to case series and two randomized controlled trials comparing topical 5-FU to photodynamic therapy, which appears to be slightly superior to topical 5-FU.

COMBINATION THERAPIES

For actinic keratoses, there are several combination treatments to boast the efficacy of topical 5-FU.

For example, a double-blinded randomized clinical trial of 19 patients with actinic damage of the arms applied 5 percent 5-FU cream twice daily to both arms, while also applying 0.05 percent tretinoin cream to one arm and a nonreactive vehicle cream to the other arm for two weeks. At three months, the tretinoin-treated arm reduced the incidence of AKs by nearly a statistically significant amount: 12.3 compared to 10.9 for the control-treated arm.

However, 63 percent of patients had more irritation of the arm receiving the dual therapy.

A second study examined the effect of combining low-dose 0.5 percent 5-FU with 10 percent salicylic acid once daily in a case series of 1,051 patients. At the end of the maximum treatment period of 14 weeks, there was a 69.7 percent reduction in the number of AKs and an 82.1 percent decrease in size.

Chief side effects included pain, erythema, skin irritation and burning sensation.

A third study found that cryosurgery followed by eight weeks of 0.5 percent 5-FU once a day was more likely than cryotherapy alone to attain 75 percent clearance: 73 percent versus 43 percent, respectively. Likewise, the combination therapy showed 100 percent clearance 40 percent of the time compared to only 13 percent of the time for cryotherapy alone.

ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS

Despite the reliability of 5-FU in treating actinic keratoses, there are also studies that indicate alternative and possibly more efficacious therapies.

For instance, a prospective randomized trial of 75 patients compared clinical, histological and cosmetic outcomes at 12 months for three different treatment regimens: cryosurgery (one or two courses), topical 5 percent 5-FU (twice daily for four weeks) and topical 5 percent imiquimod (three times a week nightly for four weeks).

The results showed that topical imiquimod achieved a better sustained clinical clearance rate: 73 percent compared to 33 percent with 5-FU and 4 percent with cryosurgery.

The histopathologic clearance rate also favored imiquimod: 73 percent versus 67 with 5-FU and 32 percent with cryosurgery at 12 months.

In addition, imiquimod provided better global cosmetic outcomes.

Another prospective randomized study of 55 patients concluded that a single session of Er:YAG laser resurfacing achieved lower one-year recurrence rates for actinic keratoses than 5 percent 5-FU twice daily for four weeks: 25.9 percent versus 60.0 percent.

“Our review provides a resource for dermatologists to reference when considering off-label uses of topical 5-FU,” Dr. Cameron says. A limitation of the review, though, is that it is not a formal meta-analysis.

REFERENCES

Prince GT, Cameron MC, Fathi R, et al. Wenande E, Phothong W, Bay C, et al. “Topical 5-Fluorouracil in Dermatologic Disease,” International Journal of Dermatology, 2018, 57: 1259-1264.
DOI: org/10.1111/ijd.14106

Krawtchenko N, Roewert-Huber J, Ulrich M, et al. “A Randomized Study of Topical 5% Imiquimod vs. Topical 5-Fluorouracil vs. Cryosurgery in Immunocompetent Patients with Actinic Keratoses: A Comparison of Clinical and Histological Outcomes Including 1-Year Follow-up,” British Journal of Dermatology, 2007; 157 Suppl 2: 34-40.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08271.x

Ostertag JU, Quaedvlieg PJ, van der Geer S, et al. “A Clinical Comparison and Long-Term Follow-Up of Topical 5-Fluorouracil Versus Laser Resurfacing in the Treatment of Widespread Actinic Keratoses,” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2006; 38: 731-739
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20379