
Review and Meta-Analysis Compares Delgocitinib to Vehicle for Chronic Hand Eczema Treatment
Key Takeaways
- Delgocitinib showed higher treatment success rates than the vehicle at weeks 4, 8, and 16 in CHE patients.
- No significant differences in adverse events were observed between delgocitinib and vehicle treatments.
Patients with CHE saw higher treatment success and a favorable safety profile with delgocitinib 20-30 mg/g.
A poster presented at the 2025 American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida, analyzed the efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib when compared with vehicle in patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE).1 Researchers completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background
CHE is categorized by inflammation, pruritus, scaling, and erythema and can often inhibit basic function. Topical treatments like corticosteroids are commonly used but present long-term safety concerns, including skin atrophy.
Delgocitinib, a novel pan-Janus kinase inhibitor, modulates inflammatory pathways that contribute to CHE’s pathophysiology. The current review analyzed delogcitinib’s tolerability and effectiveness in a 20-30 mg/g dosage.
Methods
Researchers conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared delgocitinib to vehicle. Studies published up to September 9, 2024, were included. All literature was found in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.
Treatment success was defined as a disease severity rating of “clear” or “almost clear” based on the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) or the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA). Safety outcomes were also collected. These were evaluated at weeks 4, 8, and 16.
Results
Four trials were assessed in the review: DELTA 1, DELTA 2, Worm 2020, and Worm 2022. Forest plots of treatment success and any related adverse events at each of the time points were presented.
Out of a total of 1,154 participants, approximately 65% (n = 752) received topical delgocitinib 20-30 mg/g. Compared to vehicle, a higher percentage of participants using delgocitinib reached treatment success at all time points. At week 4, 15.1% of the delgocitinib patients achieved treatment success compared to 6.2% in the vehicle groups (RR 2.32; 95% CI 1.53-3.52; p < 0.01). At week 8, 28.7% of delgocitinib users were successful versus 9.3% of vehicle users (RR 2.93; 95% CI 1.97-4.36; p < 0.01). Finally, at week 16, 25.3% of patients using delgocitinib had clear or almost clear skin when compared to 8.4% of those treated with vehicle (RR 3.17; 95% CI 1.78-5.65; p < 0.01).
Regarding adverse effects, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 therapies. Specific results are as follows:
- Adverse events: 48.2% vs. 49.0%; RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89-1.18; p = 0.74
- Treatment-related adverse events: 5.9% vs. 9.7%; RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31-1.15; p = 0.12
- Serious adverse events: 1.6% vs. 1.5%; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.38-2.48; p = 0.94)
Trial discontinuation was less frequent in those who were treated with delgocitinib (0.7% vs. 4.2%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.08-0.55; p < 0.01).
Conclusion
Overall, topical delgocitinib (20-30 mg/g) had higher treatment success rates and a favorable safety profile compared to vehicle in the treatment of CHE. According to the researchers, these findings “support its use as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with this disease.
More CHE data and recently published findings can be found below:
Reference
1. Moraes Souza R, Sarto R, Lima de Mesquita Y, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Topical Delgocitinib for Chronic Hand Eczema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Poster presented at the 2025 American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting. Orlando, Florida. March 7 to 11, 2025.
Newsletter
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.


















