Dupilumab was associated with a significantly lower risk of new atopic disease than SCS in every cohort (all P < .01). Hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52–0.86) for patients younger than 2 years, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.40–0.56) for ages 2 to 5 years, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.52–0.84) for ages 6 to 11 years, and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.52–0.79) for ages 12 to 17 years.¹
These values correspond to risk reductions of 33% to 52%, with the greatest benefit in the 2–5 year cohort. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed lower cumulative incidence of atopic march progression among dupilumab-treated patients in all 4 cohorts.¹
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the real-world study of dupilumab and atopic march progression show?
Among 2897 matched pairs of children with AD, dupilumab was associated with a significantly lower risk of new food allergy, asthma, allergic rhinitis, or EoE than SCS in all 4 age cohorts (all P < .01).¹ HRs ranged from 0.48 to 0.67.
Which age group had the greatest risk reduction with dupilumab?
Children aged 2 to 5 years had the lowest HR (0.48; 95% CI, 0.40–0.56), corresponding to a 52% lower risk of atopic march progression than SCS.
Dupilumab is an inhibitor of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, the type 2 inflammatory pathway targeted in AD.
Dupilumab Sensitivity Analysis Results and Study Limitations
A sensitivity analysis defined the outcome more stringently, requiring at least 1 inpatient claim or at least 2 outpatient claims 30 or more days apart. Under this definition, HRs were 0.39 (95% CI, 0.26–0.58) in patients younger than 2 years, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22–0.38) for ages 2 to 5 years, and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48–0.88) for ages 12 to 17 years (all P < .01). In the 6 to 11 year cohort, the HR was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.48–1.05; P = .09), which did not reach statistical significance.¹
The poster did not report safety outcomes, as the analysis focused on incidence of new atopic disease rather than adverse events. The authors noted follow-up was limited to up to 3 years, and longer-term studies are needed to assess whether the observed reduction in atopic march progression is sustained after dupilumab discontinuation. The retrospective analysis relied on claims data, and the study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.¹
“In this large, real-world US claims study, dupilumab treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of atopic march progression across all pediatric age groups compared with SCS. These findings support the potential of early dupilumab intervention to modify the development of additional atopic comorbidities in pediatric patients with AD,” Simpson et al concluded.1
Reference
- Simpson EL, Paller A, Eichenfield LF, et al. Modification of atopic march progression in dupilumab-treated pediatric atopic dermatitis patients in the United States: a retrospective, real-world study. Poster presented at: Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference 2026; October 8–11, 2026; Las Vegas, NV.