Quality of Life Impairment on the DLQI and Hand Eczema Impact Scale
Quality of life was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hand Eczema Impact Scale (HEIS), a disease-specific measure of functional impact. The mean DLQI total score was 6.7 (SD, 6.1) out of 30, and 21.9% of respondents reported a very large (11–20) or extremely large (21–30) effect on quality of life. The Symptoms and Feelings subscale showed the greatest impairment (mean, 2.6 [SD, 1.7] out of 6), followed by Daily Activities (mean, 1.4 [SD, 1.6]).²
The mean HEIS total score was 1.2 (SD, 0.9) out of 4. Domain scores were highest for Embarrassment (1.6; SD, 1.3), Frustration (1.6; SD, 1.2), and Proximal Daily Activity Limitations (1.4; SD, 1.0).²
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the Fall Clinical 2026 posters find about chronic hand eczema and work?
In a survey of 301 employed adults, CHE accounted for 31.8% overall work impairment over the past 7 days, and 11.0% of patients had changed jobs or work roles because of their disease.
How was quality of life measured in the survey of patients with chronic hand eczema?
Investigators used the DLQI and the HEIS. The mean DLQI total score was 6.7 out of 30, and the mean HEIS total score was 1.2 out of 4.
How many patients using only topical corticosteroids reported clear skin?
Among the 71.8% of patients who had used only TCS, 15.7% reported skin clearance after treatment.
Impairment increased with self-reported disease severity. Mean DLQI scores rose from 2.5 (SD, 2.8) among patients reporting clear skin to 14.2 (SD, 6.5) among those reporting very severe disease (P < .01). Mean HEIS scores followed the same pattern, increasing from 0.4 (SD, 0.4) to 2.3 (SD, 0.5) (P < .01).²
At the time of the survey, 53.0% reported clear or almost clear hands, 36.2% reported moderate disease, and 10.7% reported severe or very severe disease. When asked about their worst CHE in the previous 12 months, only 10% reported clear or almost clear skin.²
Topical therapy use was near universal (99.0%), and 71.8% had used only TCS. Among these TCS-only patients, 15.7% reported skin clearance after treatment. Mean DLQI was 2.8 (SD, 3.5) in patients reporting clearance and 8.4 (SD, 7.2) in those reporting no improvement (P = .0001).²
In the work productivity analysis, 95.7% (288/301) reported prior TCS use, and 52.8% of those patients had used TCS within the past week.¹ The authors concluded the findings emphasize the occupational burden of CHE, including reduced productivity, missed work, and job changes.¹ They also noted a substantial proportion of patients continued to have meaningful psychosocial and functional impairment despite extensive topical therapy and clear or almost clear skin at the time of the survey.²
Both analyses relied on self-reported severity, and no formal hypothesis testing was performed for the work productivity data.¹
Disclosure: LEO Pharma sponsored the study, and 4 of the 9 authors are employed by the company.1,2
References
- Weiss SC, Ozdemir S, Reed SD, et al. Impaired work productivity in adults with chronic hand eczema: a survey of patients in a large integrated healthcare system in the United States. Poster presented at: 2026 Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 8–11, 2026; Las Vegas, NV
- Weiss SC, Ozdemir S, Reed SD, et al. Quality of life and daily functioning impairment among working adults with chronic hand eczema in a large integrated healthcare system in the United States. Poster presented at: 2026 Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 8–11, 2026; Las Vegas, NV