Regardless of dosing interval, dupilumab successfully and steadily reduces IgE serum levels in patients with atopic dermatitis, according to a recent study1 published in Clinical and Experimental Allergy.
Investigators Dekkers et al sought to examine the transition from a dosing of 300 mg of dupilumab every 4 weeks to 300 mg every 6 weeks and the subsequent immunological effects of adjusting the dosing interval. They noted that prior research has demonstrated the efficacy of dupilumab in reducing IgE levels; however, they intended to explore the long-term effects of dosing interval extensions of the drug.
Key Takeaways
- Dupilumab effectively reduces IgE serum levels in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), regardless of dosing interval.
- Patients with AD who extended the dosing interval due to well-controlled AD still experienced a significant decrease in IgE levels over time, supporting the potential for extending the dosing interval of dupilumab in well-controlled AD patients.
Using the retrospective Dutch BioDay registry, investigators studied the IgE serum level of patients with AD whose treatment had entailed a dosing interval extension beginning at once every 2 weeks. The interval had been adjusted to once every 4 weeks and then to once every 6 weeks using a patient-centered dosing regimen reliant on Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scoring.
Twenty-one patients were assigned to undergo prolongation of dupilumab dosing interval, while 20 patients were assigned to a stable dosing interval. At treatment initiation, 1 year after Q2W dosing, and annually after, investigators collected blood samples from all participants. These blood samples were also compared to that of 11 otherwise healthy volunteers who did not have AD or another atopic disease.
At baseline, the average EASI score among patients in the prolongation dosing group was 17.24, while in members of the stable dosing group, the average was 19.37. Compared to healthy volunteer samples, IgE levels were significantly higher.
“It is clearly visible that the mean EASI in group A [prolongation] remains lower compared to group B [stable], which can be explained by the fact that the patients in group A were able to extend the dosing interval due to well-controlled AD, whereas the patients in group B were not,” wrote study authors.