
|Articles|February 1, 2004
Complementary fillers seen as future of facial rejuvenation
New York - Comparing the pros and cons of facial rejuvenation techniques such as dermal fillers, Botox, and nonablative lasers is like comparing the pros and cons of peanut butter and jelly. They are completely different products that aren't nearly as effective alone as they are together. That's what oculoplastic surgeons Stephen Bosniak, M.D., New York, and Marian Zilkha, M.D., Brazil, found in their study of FDA-approved Restylane and Perlane (pending approval).
Advertisement
Newsletter
Like what you’re reading? Subscribe to Dermatology Times for weekly updates on therapies, innovations, and real-world practice tips.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Dermatology Times
1
First-in-Class Topical GT20029 Demonstrates Promising Phase 2 Efficacy and Tolerability for AGA
2
Highlighting Major Breakthroughs for Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis in 2025
3
Expert Panel Unanimously Backs DecisionDx-Melanoma for Guiding Personalized Cancer Care
4
Considering Biologics and Shared Decision-Making in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Part 2
5

















